Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Federico Gaio vs Or Ram-Harel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gaio vs Ram-Harel analysis and find out who is favored!
Federico Gaio vs Or Ram-Harel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gaio 1 - 0 Ram-Harel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gaio has won 47.35% of points on their second serve, while Ram-Harel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gaio, in recent form, has won 48.96% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ram-Harel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.64% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gaio has saved 56.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ram-Harel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gaio has won 40.43% of matches played (W/L 19/ 28), with Ram-Harel winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gaio has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 330/ 254), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9). Ram-Harel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 68/ 55), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Gaio has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 39.39% of matches (W/L 13/ 20), where as Ram-Harel has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gaio winning 1 times and Ram-Harel being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gaio winning 2 and Ram-Harel winning 1. The last match between Gaio and Ram-Harel was at the Israel F6, 30-05-2011, First, Hard with Federico Gaio getting the victory 1-6 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gaio and Ram-Harel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gaio winning 1 times and Ram-Harel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gaio winning 0, and Ram-Harel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gaio has played against opponents with an average rank of 295.13 while Ram-Harel has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gaio has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ram-Harel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gaio has converted 36.42% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ram-Harel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
408
Rank
124
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
557
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
Form
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
54% (522-436)
Career Total W/L
55% (82-68)
42% (10-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$392,005
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Federico Gaio vs Or Ram-Harel For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gaio VS Ram-Harel
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Federico Gaio | Or Ram-Harel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 13 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-2 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Federico Gaio | Or Ram-Harel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (10/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (23/35) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (247/293) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 88 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 87 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:25 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 274.58 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1023/1748) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (684/1023) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (341/725) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (59/161) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (652/1753) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 36% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 39% (9/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 19% (16/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Federico Gaio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Federico Gaio
Player
Egor Gerasimov
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Federico Gaio
48%
(
32 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Blake Mott
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Federico Gaio
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Federico Gaio
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
50 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Andrea Picchione
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Simone Agostini
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Paul Barbier Gazeu
73%
(
68 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Or Ram-Harel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Giorgio Ricca
Player
Or Ram-Harel
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
91)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Conor Berg
Player
Or Ram-Harel
58%
(
15 of
26)
1st Serve %
69%
(
25 of
36)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
11 of
15)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
7 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
37
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Or Ram-Harel
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vladyslav Orlov
Player
Or Ram-Harel
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
47
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Or Ram-Harel
Player
Hugo Schott
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Or Ram-Harel
Player
Yaron Guberman
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Or Ram-Harel
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Or Ram-Harel
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Bastian Trinker
Player
Or Ram-Harel
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gaio Vs Ram-Harel Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gaio are available here and Ram-Harel photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
